Difference between revisions of "Television Studies: An Overview (Discussion)"
(update group numbers) |
|||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
== Bibliography == | == Bibliography == | ||
#Butler, Jeremy G. ''Television: Critical Methods and Applications''. NY: Routledge, 2011. | #Butler, Jeremy G. ''Television: Critical Methods and Applications''. NY: Routledge, 2011. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
[[Category:TCF311]] | [[Category:TCF311]] | ||
[[Category:TCF311 Discussion]] | [[Category:TCF311 Discussion]] |
Revision as of 13:56, 22 September 2011
Mass-comm methods vs. television-studies methods
To understand the difference between empirical and critical methods, we need to look at their basic principles and presumptions. The class will be divided into mass-comm researchers and television-studies theorists for this first exercise.
Mass Comm Research | Television Studies |
Group 4 Group 2 |
Group 1 Group 3 |
Criteria for evaluating critical work
All groups will discuss Vande Berg, Wenner and Gronbeck's criteria for evaluating critical work--looking at one specific criterion.
Group 1
- Explain what Vande Berg, Wenner and Gronbeck mean by internal consistency.
Group 2
- Explain what Vande Berg, Wenner and Gronbeck mean by evidence.
Group 3
- Explain what Vande Berg, Wenner and Gronbeck mean by cultural, critical, theoretical and practical significance.
Group 4
- Explain what Vande Berg, Wenner and Gronbeck mean by reasonableness for a critical interpretation.
Bibliography
- Butler, Jeremy G. Television: Critical Methods and Applications. NY: Routledge, 2011.