Difference between pages "JCM311 Critical Studies in Television" and "JCM312/Bazinian Realism (Discussion)"

From Screenpedia
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎Study groups: 2012 class roster)
 
(→‎Discussion Group 4: added examples)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''TCF 311 Critical Studies in Television''' is a discussion-oriented course taught by [[User:Jeremy Butler|Jeremy Butler]].
+
== Discussion Group 1 ==
  
== Course objectives ==
+
Bazin claims Renoir is "the only director who consistently, attempted in his films up to La Règle du Jeu (Rules of the Game) to rise above facile editing effects and seize the secret of a cinematic style which was capable of expressing everything without fragmenting the world, of revealing the hidden meaning of human beings and their environment without destroying their natural unity" (48). Do you agree that Renoir's style does not "fragment the world"? Why or why not?
  
The online syllabus is over here (Fall 2011):
+
== Discussion Group 2 ==
  
http://uaops.ua.edu/syllabus/201140/40596
+
Bazin sees "two broad and opposing trends in the cinema between 1920 and 1940: those directors who put their faith in the image and those who put their faith in reality." What does Bazin mean by faith in reality? Can you think of modern directors who fall into this category?
  
== Online study guides ==
+
== Discussion Group 3 ==
===Chronological order===
 
*[[TV Structure (Discussion)]]
 
*[[Narrative Structure (Discussion)]]
 
*[[Building Narrative (Discussion)]]
 
*[[Beyond and Beside Narrative (Discussion)]]
 
*[[Television Studies: An Overview (Discussion)]]
 
*[[Style and Stylistics (Discussion)]]
 
*[[Genre Study (Discussion)]]
 
*[[Semiotics (Discussion)]]
 
*[[Semiotics II (Discussion)]]
 
*[[Ideological Criticism, Cultural Studies & Production Studies (Discussion)]]
 
*[[Discourse & Identity I & II (Discussion)]]
 
*[[Discourse & Identity III (Discussion)]]
 
*[[Mise-en-Scene (Discussion)]]
 
*[[Style and the Camera (Discussion)]]
 
*[[Editing: Single Camera Mode (Discussion)]]
 
*[[Editing: Multiple Camera Mode (Discussion)]]
 
*[[Sound (Discussion)]]
 
*[[A History of TV Style (Discussion)]]
 
*[[Music Television (Discussion)]]
 
*[[The Commercial (Discussion)]]
 
*[[Animation (Discussion)]]
 
  
===List of discussion notes===
+
Bazin sees "two broad and opposing trends in the cinema between 1920 and 1940: those directors who put their faith in the image and those who put their faith in reality." Bazin says the "faith in image" directors can be "traced back to two factors." What are they? How does a Russian film movement exemplify one of these factors?
[[:Category:TCF311 Discussion]]
 
  
==Study groups==
+
== Discussion Group 4 ==
{| class="wikitable" border="1"
 
|-
 
|
 
===Group 1===
 
*Bridget Bailey
 
*Kim Bolling
 
*Alexis Butler
 
*Troy Gibson
 
*James Herron
 
|
 
===Group 2===
 
*Jessica Judge
 
*Matt Kenyon
 
*Halley Keyes
 
*Brian Levine
 
*Betsey Lindor
 
*Josh McCoy
 
|
 
===Group 3===
 
*Christian Menard
 
*Molly Mitchell
 
*Nathaniel Reed
 
*Luke Ryan
 
*Dave Shumate
 
*Shenique Milton
 
|
 
===Group 4===
 
*Allison Smith
 
*Benjamin Smith
 
*Hannah Ward
 
*Taylor Ward
 
*Alex Webster
 
|}
 
  
== Texts & resources ==
+
Bazin contends that "analytic" or "dramatic" editing (i.e., "shooting script") was "strongly challenged by the technique of composition in depth used by Orson Welles and William Wyler." What is composition in depth? What are some examples from Welles's, Wyler's and/or Renoir's work? You can find examples here:
  
===Books===
+
http://www.tcf.ua.edu/classes/Jbutler/T340/Bazin02.htm
*Jeremy G. Butler, ''Television: Critical Methods and Applications'', Third Edition (Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2007). See the companion Website at TVCrit.com.  
 
  
===Articles and book chapters===
+
==Bibliography==
 +
*Bazin, André. "The Evolution of Film Language." In ''The New Wave'', pp. 24-51. Edited and translated by Peter Graham. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1968.
  
[[Category:TCF311]]
+
[[Category:TCF340 Discussion]]
[[Category:TCF Classes]]
 

Revision as of 20:00, 13 October 2008

Discussion Group 1

Bazin claims Renoir is "the only director who consistently, attempted in his films up to La Règle du Jeu (Rules of the Game) to rise above facile editing effects and seize the secret of a cinematic style which was capable of expressing everything without fragmenting the world, of revealing the hidden meaning of human beings and their environment without destroying their natural unity" (48). Do you agree that Renoir's style does not "fragment the world"? Why or why not?

Discussion Group 2

Bazin sees "two broad and opposing trends in the cinema between 1920 and 1940: those directors who put their faith in the image and those who put their faith in reality." What does Bazin mean by faith in reality? Can you think of modern directors who fall into this category?

Discussion Group 3

Bazin sees "two broad and opposing trends in the cinema between 1920 and 1940: those directors who put their faith in the image and those who put their faith in reality." Bazin says the "faith in image" directors can be "traced back to two factors." What are they? How does a Russian film movement exemplify one of these factors?

Discussion Group 4

Bazin contends that "analytic" or "dramatic" editing (i.e., "shooting script") was "strongly challenged by the technique of composition in depth used by Orson Welles and William Wyler." What is composition in depth? What are some examples from Welles's, Wyler's and/or Renoir's work? You can find examples here:

http://www.tcf.ua.edu/classes/Jbutler/T340/Bazin02.htm

Bibliography

  • Bazin, André. "The Evolution of Film Language." In The New Wave, pp. 24-51. Edited and translated by Peter Graham. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1968.